Talk about the growth of communism in the States

Communism has always been a significant threat to the United States. The Cold War showed clashes between Communism and Capitalism on a global scale. There are signs that communism may become a renewed threat in the 21st century. China and Cuba remain Communist states that resist intervention by the United States. There is also North Korea, which is a Communist regime headed up by a dictator. But few would expect that the United States could be infiltrated by communist right at home. See how Communism has spread to a significant extent over the years. That could surprise many people who want to keep the country the same.

The Communist Party of the USA has been an active leader for their own movement. They were founded in 1919 and have over a century of history behind them. They were highly influential with the labor movements of the 1930’s. That has been a surprising element behind groups like the Teamsters and other union groups. Now, the Communist Party of USA is hoping to gain more ground. They hire lobbyists and other influential people to conduct their operations in the country. That poses a risk to the Capitalist nature of the USA as of today.

The modern day Red Scare doesn’t always happen like history has shown. There are unseen forces that can undermine the Capitalist foundation of the USA. The country hopes to make the progress meaningful in a lot of ways. The Red Scare could be as simple as communal farms or socialist organization groups. Barack Obama was once thought to be a socialist sympathizer who wanted to support Communism. Leaders have called for a renewed group focus to see how the program is working. That could deter future supporters of communism in various forms. And there are movements to introduce other ideas to the fold as well.

Supporting the right Capitalist organizations can be a big step forward. Check out blogs that promote good work done in the community. Many organizations are changing the way people look at the country. These activist groups want to support the change that people are seeking. The program is sure to amaze people who want to learn more about Capitalism. Education is always a good policy and has made a difference so far. These groups are making headway towards their own goals as well. That could help the country become a Capitalist leader once again these days.

The donations people provide should be sent to the right groups. These donors want to see real change happen fairly soon. They see a good future for the United States as a Capitalist leader. The GDP of the USA is still on top of the world. The manufacturers and corporate leaders want to make the progress possible. It takes everyday effort by those involved to see the program through until the end. That is sure to inspire a new generation of supporters as well. People work to see Capitalism become the top ideology in the United States.

Should Social Media Be Treated As Public Utilities

Social media as a public utility is a theory that suggests social networking sites should be regulated by the government in a similar manner to utilities such a power and phone. The argument for it stems after they started censoring and banning people like Alex Jones. That’s when they entered the domain of should the government regulate this because they’re censoring free speech. They said they wouldn’t intervene in what users say, but they act like journalistic entities that are providing news. So the free speech argument is where this is bordering on, not for the sake of arguing whether they should or shouldn’t be a public utility, that alone wouldn’t stand on its own leg.

Advocates for the theory that these social media sites should be regulated by the government believe that these sites already act as public utilities, therefore need regulation. These advocates also argue that in the technological age that we are currently in, these websites are imperative to communication such as telephone was before the popularization of the internet. The supporters of this argument suggest that social media sites are as necessary to everyday life as gas and electricity and therefore need government regulations placed on them.

The main argument for regulations on social media, on an individual level, is placed on the needs and rights of the users. Supporters of this theory claim that without governmental regulations in place, it’s impossible to protect the constitutional rights of users such as their right to express free speech. On a business level, advocates for social media as public utilities claim that these services dominate the free internet and are owned by three or four companies that have the power to shape interaction, creating natural monopolies. To oppose these natural monopolies, supports of this theory feel that restrictions can be imposed on these sites that benefit competitors and rivals, which would help to counteract the natural monopolies that are in place.

The opposition to this theory argue that social media should not be regulated by the government because these platforms are constantly changing and evolving and are not essential to the survival of their users on a day to day basis, the way power, electricity and water are needed. Another counterargument to this theory is the fear that imposing utility regulations on social media might lock these sites into a real monopoly which will stop innovation and counteract competition. Since these sites are constantly evolving to adapt to the needs of the users, it is important that these sites evolve, innovate and compete.

Counterarguments, on the individual level, feel that treating social media services as public utilities would harm the welfare of consumers because regulations stifle innovation and competition. They argue that while social media sites are extremely popular, they are not essential to the survival of our social and economic functions on a day to day basis. There is also an emphasis placed on the fact that while social media is relatively new, new ones displace old ones. This displacement of websites means that social media is not a public utility because it proves they are not an essential facility that has no alternatives.

On a business level, opposition to transitioning these sites to public utilities claim that imposing regulations would halt innovation and competition, and that said regulations would be expensive. These regulations would allow competitors to innovate for the sake of innovation, rather than for the sake of consumer needs and user experience. At its very essence, opposers to this theory claim that public utilities are essential to everyday life such as water and electricity which is not the case for social media. While these sites are large pieces to our everyday lives, they are not essential to our survival and life would go on if they were to disappear.

It is really a matter of opinion if sites such as Youtube, Facebook, Twitter, and Google should be treated as public utilities.

What Will Be The Future Legal Ramifications of AI vs Human

Artificial Intelligence is a disruptive force we cannot overlook anymore. There is evidence of it in the way we live, transact business to how we are governed. There is a rising need for structures to guide responsible conduct of markets and systems of governance without suffocating innovation.

The recent summons of the founder and CEO of Facebook, Mark Zuckerberg, by US Senate heightened the awareness of the potential risks posed by data-driven AI technologies. As AI becomes more and more integrated into our daily lives, here is a look at the conflicts we can expect:

Autonomous cars: Over 200 start-ups and tech companies are keen on curving their own piece of the revolution in the automotive industry. With this, they expose themselves to lawsuits in the areas of:

o Health:

Prolonged exposure to electromagnetic radiation from all the signal sending and receiving gadgets in the cars will cause health issues for users

o Security:

compromised safety from malfunctions and risk of being hacked open a whole other can of worms. The complacency of users will reduce response time in the unpredictable events of the road.

Also, a skilled hacker could gain access to a user’s personal information for sale or ransom. The biggest concern would, however, be terrorist networks gaining access to such a car for use as a weapon.

Law firms are using AI to perform paralegal work such as due diligence with efficiency. It is also used to process documents faster with more accurate detection of errors.

Algorithms will be employed to predict the outcomes of litigation by studying patterns. These patterns have to be fed in as data. Biased or incomplete data will give a biased outcome and this is where the conflict will be found.

Military forces will employ cutting-edge robotic systems such as the rumoured “Lethal Autonomous Weapons” program that will identify and hit targets without human approval or involvement. Issues of decision-making in complex scenarios will arise.

Monitoring of access to data and knowledge: the world today is rife with interconnections between everything. Social media and consumer goods companies are collecting huge amounts of data from each one of us to help them determine our individual patterns with accuracy. Our interests (explicit and implicit), activities and interests.

AI systems with access to this information will be able to accurately predict current and future needs as well as behaviours. Thinking about the output of this AI shows just how powerful whoever was to control this information would be. Issues of unauthorized access to all this personal information are bound to find their way to court.

Technological unemployment: as the machines take over and improve on jobs in major industries, uprisings will emerge that will demand things back to how they were. Such unrests could lead to property being damaged, hence arrests and arraignment.

Decision making in the heat of the moment: emerging AI is being applied to automate critical processes and decisions in real-time. Their capacity to be objective in the determination of the outcomes of such decisions is, however, a point that needs to be examined under a microscope. How will an AI react to situations with moral and ethical aspects?

AI logic must be predefined without bias understood properly before they are accepted.

Interesting Cases Where Social Media Helped in Solving a Serious Crime

There is no uncertainty online networking has been gainful for some criminal equity establishments.
For the police, online networking has given them phenomenal access to general society, and the other way around. By means of Facebook and Twitter, police and people in general can impart continuously about occurrences and occasions. This has demonstrated priceless amid times of emergency, as well as on an everyday premise and at the nearby level.
Online networking has additionally turned into an imperative device in police examinations. For instance, the arrival of CCTV film of Melbourne lady Jill Meagher’s last minutes by means of Facebook pages and YouTube helped with securing her executioner.
Besides, the web-based social networking “broadcasting” of criminal trials has included an additional level of straightforwardness to criminal procedures.
Yet, while live tweeting speaks to a stage forward in accomplishing open equity, there remain worries with the training.

There is no uncertainty online networking has been valuable for some criminal equity foundations.

For the police, online networking has given them remarkable access to the general population, and the other way around. By means of Facebook and Twitter, police and the general population can impart progressively about episodes and occasions. This has demonstrated priceless amid times of emergency, as well as on an everyday premise and at the neighborhood level.

Web-based social networking has likewise turned into a vital device in police examinations. For instance, the arrival of CCTV film of Melbourne lady Jill Meagher’s last minutes by means of Facebook pages and YouTube helped with catching her executioner.

Besides, the online networking “broadcasting” of criminal trials has included an additional level of straightforwardness to criminal procedures.

In any case, while live-tweeting speaks to a stage forward in accomplishing open equity, there remain worries with the training.

At the opposite end of the range, online networking has been blamed for posturing dangers for some clients, especially youngsters.
Likewise, the capacity for crooks to utilize web-based social networking stages to track potential casualties (and their belonging) was featured in the current Kim Kardashian theft.Moreover, “old” wrongdoings, for example, provocation and dangers, and in addition misrepresentation and fraud, have been led in new routes through online networking.

Online networking is additionally changing the idea of post-wrongdoing conduct. Purported execution wrongdoings – where guilty parties brag about their criminal conduct to their companions and supporters online – are progressively normal.

At last, “sofa criminologists”, anxious to recognize suspects, frequently say something regarding online networking, which can, best case scenario be diverting for law authorization and even from a pessimistic standpoint result in guiltless individuals being wrongly denounced.

 Action on Facebook and Twitter can represent a risk to arraignments and the privilege to a reasonable trial through practices, for example, sharing photographs of the blamed before a prosecution, production of despising gatherings, or hearers sharing their musings about a case on the web.

In the Meagher case, Victoria Police utilized its Facebook page to teach people in general about the results of such breaks. Moreover, a web choke via web-based networking media was forced by a justice who smothered the data that may trade off the trial.

Online networking can likewise be utilized as an apparatus for casualty accusing, as happened after the Kardashian theft. Promptly following the episode, some Facebook and Twitter clients contended she got “what she merits” and that “perhaps she will cover herself up now”.

Online networking can be further be utilized as a weapon through which the loved ones of casualties of wrongdoing are presented to optional exploitation.

How social media pressure has helped the “little guy”

Many people wonder why many small businesses are becoming active on social networking sites like Facebook, Twitter, and LinkedIn. This can be explained in only a few words why they do that. Because it’s hot! And what could be the better way to connect to business and clients when there are millions of people connecting to whatever they like every day. Small businesses are taking advantage of this networking and making their business bigger and profitable.

Today, when anybody wants to find anything on the web, what do they do? They hop on Google and look for it. Google is kind enough to prioritize, index, sort, and rank the websites closely matching our interest. Thanks, Google!

I need an attorney; Google says, here are some attorneys. I’m looking for a great Thai restaurant; Google says, here’s a few. I’m trying to find a good doctor; Google says, here are some numbers. Google is so helpful.

Now, we needed Google in the past because the medium wasn’t inherently social. We needed an engine-a piece of software to sift through the pile of data – to help find things we were looking for.

Social media is the tool that helps others to share your name; to point others to your brand; to quickly hand somebody an electronic business card with your name on it. If your card isn’t available to hand out – if you don’t have a Facebook Page, for example – it makes it difficult to refer you. Social media makes it easier for others to refer, mention, praise, and respond to your company, thereby improving your visibility.

Thanks to the rise of social networking sites and social media those efforts are becoming more time and cost-effective. In a recent study, more people use the web for social networking than email. In fact, almost 67% of people use the internet mainly for accessing and participating in social communities. Given the number of individuals involved in these communities, it allows businesses of all size access to the same customer base.

Small businesses can then compete with the bigger companies by connecting to their customers directly. Then based on positive experience word of mouth will help spread the word about the company.

Advertising on the social networks is also more helpful to small businesses. Large companies have the dollars to spend on TV, radio, or print advertising on a regular basis. Smaller companies might be able to purchase those spots once in a while but probably not as much. Well, advertising on the social web is more cost effective, and you can reach your audience much more directly which makes it a much more valuable tool.

The real advantage of the social web though is the ease of access to your customers. Large companies are using the social web too, but the nice thing about that avenue is it is more of an equal playing field. Small companies have the same access as big business, and they are all communicating with the same customers. Sure larger companies have more resources, whether people or money, to devote to their projects but that does not necessarily make them more efficient.

The key to success on the social web is to know your audience. You have to know who they are, where they are, what they want, and what the most important factors to them are. If you can learn the important information about your customers, you can be just as successful reaching them as your larger competitors are.

Why is America not impressed by the European Socialism or Capitalism?

Virtually speaking, every economy in the world lies under two different categories: the state capitalism or the private capitalism. As a matter of fact, those countries that do not fall under the two categories represents mixed economies that encompasses both extremes and a good example includes the sovereign state of America.

The European counterparts such as Denmark, Norway and the USSR either fall under the two extremities. On the other hand, countries that are perceived to be socialists do not have workers running the business of production. Why then is America not flinched by the socialism deeply rooted in some of the European countries?

The Denmark former minister of finance- Mogens Lykketoft at one point gave out a statement that spoke volumes. Mogens set forth a plan to actively improve tax intake in the country and after making the reforms, he noted that despite the numerous state efforts put in place to curb socialism, the number of socialists in Denmark will never come down. This action by the minister shows his commitment towards eradicating the notion of capitalism. Furthermore, capitalists in Denmark hold the minority position and the country is on a quest to become ‘state minded’.

Denmark is definitely grappling with the grave effects of their tolerance towards capitalism. This minority group do not contribute much towards the generation of the necessary revenues to run the state welfare. As a matter of fact, its ranks high in terms of total tax pressure, surpassing the European average which is arguably high enough. It is worth noting that the private sector generally contributes a lot in the economy of any given state, however Denmark has the least private sector in the whole of Europe, the only one that holds the big public sector in the country.

It is rather ironical and somewhat far-fetched of Denmark to provide a very generous income package to its employed and unemployed citizens that nearly equates the salary earned by full time workers in the private sector in majority of European states. At that rate, the country has to increase the tax revenues to levels that has never been achieved by any other country in the world. Majority of the country’s population is either unemployed or working in the public sector, and if a citizen don’t fall under the two categories, then they benefit from a community pay plan. The sick also add pressure to the little tax revenue that is generated.

A little over 20 percent of the population does not depend on the transfer payments made by the state. However, out of the 20 %, a considerable chunk relies on free medical services, subsidized housing or lower childcare costs. In essence, the whole population is virtually dependent on the government through one way or another. In the long run, the ballooning public expenditure will reach a level that is unmanageable.

Generally speaking, the western countries believe that a social welfare community risks endangering the business health of a country. America, for example is among the leading economies of the world because it has managed its public expenditure and has nurtured an independent culture among its citizens.